Is Jesus the Only Savior?

by Ronald H. Nash

Nash suggests that there are three possible answers to this question: No; Yes, but; and Yes, period. Each answer represents a different viewpoint. The first represents pluralism: the view that all religions lead to the same God. The second represents inclusivism: the view that other religions lead to God, but do so (somehow) through Christ. The third answer represents exclusivism: the traditional Christian viewpoint—Jesus is the only way to God.

This book is divided into two parts: one addressing pluralism and one addressing inclusivism. Nash argues primarily against some of the major proponents of these positions by summarizing their position—largely by quoting from their various writings—and then responding to them with scripture and logic. His case is compelling that both pluralism and inclusivism are intellectually and scripturally bankrupt positions. In the final analysis, he concludes, the Bible teaches exclusivism.

That such a book is needed may be shocking to you. After all, the Bible clearly teaches that Jesus is the only way to God. But, sadly, that’s not the end of the matter. The intellectual hoops that people will jump through to explain away such clear passages is staggering. Nash shows, one by one, where the fault lies in each supposed explanation of why Jesus isn’t the only savior.

Although the following issues are covered in the periphery of his main arguments, the cover suggests other questions that are pertinent and addressed: Is there a second chance after death? What about those who have never heard? Is sincerity enough? These questions, and others, are all discussed in his study of pluralism and inclusivism.

As with all books, you will likely find areas in which you disagree with Nash. But overall, this book is worth reading—especially if you know any one who denies the exclusivity of Christianity. Or, perhaps, this whole issue is new to you. In that case, it might be worth your while to read so you’re not blind-sided by it when it does come up in conversation.